Blogpost written by Marc de Werd - Courtesy Press Service of
the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg
TELEPHONE TAPPING
The cases of Niculescu v. Romania and Valentino Acatrinei v. Romania concern criminal proceedings brought against a former lawyer and judge for corruption as a result of telephone tapping by the Romanian Intelligence Service. Both applicants complain that the criminal proceedings brought against them were unfair and allege that the telephone tapping of their conversations used as evidence to convict them was illegal. The Court found a violation of Article 8 in respect of both applicants. It ruled before that the system in place in Romania for telephone tapping on grounds of national security lacked proper safeguards and thus breached the requirements of Article 8.